E. (1985)patibility during the father or mother-newborn relationship: Roots and operations

Mutton, Yards. Age., & Gilbride, K. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Understood similarity and relationships victory certainly matchmaking couples: An idiographic method

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). When the I am not hot, will you be sizzling hot or not?: Physical-attractiveness recommendations and you may matchmaking needs since a purpose of a person’s own elegance. Mental Science, 19, 669677. [ Hyperlinks ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, Yards. (1985)patibility in-marriage or any other romantic dating. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible relationships (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of aspiration. For the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Personality plus the behavior conditions (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Website links ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationships relationships destiny that have insiders’ and you will outsiders’ perspective: Exactly who and you may what is requested issues. Individual Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you may relationship high quality within the newly wedded couples: A few based strategy. Journal away from Identity and you may Personal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A great. (2006). Internet dating. Washington, DC: Statement to your Pew Websites & Western Lifestyle Project. Recovered , from [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, M. (1999). Assessing the accuracy out-of predictions throughout the matchmaking matchmaking: Just how and just why create lovers’ forecasts change from the individuals from observers? Identification and you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 25, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing items regarding initiation of heterosexual dating. Report shown during the Earliest Global Meeting on the Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Links ]

Merkle, E.R., & Richardson, Roentgen.A beneficial. (2000). Digital relationship and you will digital related: Conceptualizing pc mediated personal relationships. Relatives, forty two, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]

Montoya, Roentgen. Meters., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually genuine similarity necessary for appeal? A meta-study off real and recognized resemblance. Record of Societal and private Matchmaking, twenty five, 889-922. [ Hyperlinks ]

Morry, Yards. Meters. (2005). Dating fulfillment due to the fact an excellent predictor from similarity feedback; An examination of one’s attraction-resemblance hypothesis. Diary regarding Societal and personal Relationship, 22, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Log away from Social and private Dating, 23, 865-880

Morry, Yards. Meters. (2007). The new appeal-similarity hypothesis one of get across-sex members of the family: Relationships fulfillment, identified similarities, and you will notice-serving thinking. Record out-of Public and private Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Backlinks ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you may extension of one’s SVR idea from dyadic combining. Journal regarding ily, 49, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can divorce proceedings: An excellent 14-year longitudinal examination of black people and light people. Record from Public and personal Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The new like algorithm Suits believes it’s receive a formula getting governing the net matchmaking team: A technological strategy to find Mr. otherwise Ms. Proper. Business 2.0 Magazine. Retrieved towards the of [ Website links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Character parallels into the couples. Character and you will Personal Differences, 45, 533-535. [ Website links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: Just what qualities create group desire inside their small-name sexual and you will much time-title personal couples? Record off Psychology and you can Individual Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Website links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The brand new character of your own notice on asiandate datum initiation and span of public interaction. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and in conflict dating (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]